• Attorneys
  • Practices & Industries
  • Thought Leadership +
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Publications
      • Chemical Law & Prop 65 Blog
    • Webinars
  • News & Events +
    • News
    • Events/
      Speaking Engagements
  • About
  • Careers
  • Diversity
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Payment Portal +
    • Pay your invoice
    • Pay your retainer
Buchalter
  • About
  • Careers
  • Diversity
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Attorneys
  • Practices & Industries
  • Thought Leadership +
    • Publications
      • Chemical Law & Prop 65 Blog
    • Webinars
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • News & Events +
    • News
    • Events/
      Speaking Engagements
  • Payment Portal +
    • Pay your invoice
    • Pay your retainer
« View All Publications

A Patent For A Formula Does Not Destroy Trade Secret Status So Long As The Patent Does Not Disclose The “Process” For Applying The Trade Secret

  • Download


Buchalter Client Alert

 

On November 20, 2019, the California Court of Appeal confirmed that a patent for a formula does not destroy a formula’s trade secret status so long as the patent does not disclose the process for applying the trade secret.

In Global Protein Products, Inc. v. Le (2019) 2019 Cal.App. LEXIS 1156, appellants Kevin K. Le and West Coast AG, LLC (“Appellants”) appealed from the trial court’s denial of their renewed motion to dissolve a stipulated permanent injunction, which prohibited Appellants from acquiring, disclosing or using a trade secret formula developed by Global Protein Products, Inc. (“Respondent”).

Appellants claimed that when Respondent made certain public disclosures of the ingredients of the formula in connection with obtaining a patent, that this resulted in the information contained in the trade secret becoming part of the public domain and extinguishing the previously existing trade secret status.

The California Court of Appeal, while agreeing with the general statement of the law that, “publication of a trade secret destroys it,” the Court of Appeal did not agree that trade secret status was forfeited in this instance. * 25. This was because Respondents, “trade secret was not limited to the identity of the components used; the trade secret encompassed the proprietary formula and the process for treating lettuce.” * 26.

The benefits of a patent and a trade secret are both of immeasurable value. However, with the benefit of qualified legal counsel, you may not have to sacrifice the benefit of one to get the benefit of the other.

 


This alert is published as a service to our clients and friends. The material contained here is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute advertising, solicitation or legal advice. The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Buchalter or its clients. For more information, visit www.buchalter.com.

 

Share

Related Areas

  • Trade Secrets & Employee Mobility

Related Attorneys

  • Jason E. Goldstein
  • Dylan W. Wiseman
Buchalter footer logo

Adam Bass, Buchalter President & CEO

  • About
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Subscribe
  • CA Privacy Notice
  • PI Opt-Out
  • Denver
  • Los Angeles
  • Napa Valley
  • Orange County
  • Portland
  • Sacramento
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Scottsdale
  • Seattle
  • © Copyright 2023 Buchalter, A Professional Corporation
Buchalter Communications

We love sharing our knowledge, but we don't want to inundate you. If you would like to receive communications from Buchalter, please highlight the text boxes below indicating which type of communications you would like to receive, and provide your name and email address. [Street address is only necessary for Points and Authorities.] We appreciate your interest in our work.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Sign Up