• Attorneys
  • Practices & Industries
  • Thought Leadership +
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Publications
      • Chemical Law & Prop 65 Blog
    • Webinars
  • News & Events +
    • News
    • Events/
      Speaking Engagements
  • About
  • Careers
  • Diversity
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Payment Portal +
    • Pay your invoice
    • Pay your retainer
Buchalter
  • About
  • Careers
  • Diversity
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Attorneys
  • Practices & Industries
  • Thought Leadership +
    • Publications
      • Chemical Law & Prop 65 Blog
    • Webinars
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • News & Events +
    • News
    • Events/
      Speaking Engagements
  • Payment Portal +
    • Pay your invoice
    • Pay your retainer
« View All Publications

Silence is Golden – NLRB Affirms Employer Restrictions on Employee Discussions with Media

October 11, 2019
Jennings Strouss

By: Chris M. Mason

“Continuing its recent conservative approach, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) ruled Thursday that an employer’s policies restricting employees from answering media inquiries and discussing customer information with third parties were lawful. The decision in LA Specialty Produce Co. and Teamsters Local 70 joined similar Board decisions reached in the past two years by relying on the standard adopted by the Board in December of 2017 in Boeing Co. Under the Boeing Co. standard, written employer policies are evaluated based on the nature and extent of their potential impact on employee rights guaranteed by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) counterbalanced against an employer’s legitimate business justifications. Using these considerations, policies are grouped into one of three categories designed to help guide employers and future Board determinations.

In LA Specialty Produce Co., the challenged employer policies prohibited employees from answering media inquiries and from providing the employer’s client/vendor lists to third parties. A majority of the Board ruled that the policies furthered legitimate employer interests without interfering with protected rights. The majority reasoned that the client/vendor list rule did not prohibit employees from discussing concerns with union representatives, despite claims otherwise, and that restrictions on media inquiries did not interfere with employees’ rights to talk with media sources about workplace concerns because it only barred workers from speaking for the company when approached by the media. Employees are still free to take union and workplace concerns to the press under the policy. ”

To view the full article, please click here.

Share

Related Attorneys

  • Chris Mason
Buchalter footer logo

Adam Bass, Buchalter President & CEO

  • About
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Subscribe
  • Denver
  • Los Angeles
  • Napa Valley
  • Orange County
  • Portland
  • Sacramento
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Scottsdale
  • Seattle
  • © Copyright 2023 Buchalter, A Professional Corporation
  • Privacy Notice
  • Notice at Collection
  • Do Not Sell or Share PI
Buchalter Communications

We love sharing our knowledge, but we don't want to inundate you. If you would like to receive communications from Buchalter, please highlight the text boxes below indicating which type of communications you would like to receive, and provide your name and email address. [Street address is only necessary for Points and Authorities.] We appreciate your interest in our work.

"*" indicates required fields

Type*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.