November 24, 2025|Publications
The Daily Mail
‘”If you are a party in litigation, your tactic of suing opposing counsel is apt to trigger swift retaliation: an anti-SLAPP motion.” So began the court of appeal in Ramirez V McCormack (2025) 113 Cal.App.5th 493, reversing a lower court order denying the defendant’s lawyer’s anti-SLAPP motion. The reasoning was simple: Counsel assisting their clients in petitioning activity falls within the anti-SLAPP statutes screening provisions that prohibit lawsuits arising out of…”
To read the full article, click here. (Subscription required)
